Get involved: send your photos, videos, news & views by texting bfp news to 80360 or email »
1:12pm Friday 8th August 2008
OH BOTHER! It's a fair cop. Mr Weeden has me bang to rights' in the BFP letters page! Or does he?
In his letter on July 25 ("CO2 is not to blame"), he has "exposed me" to the people of Marlow! It's true!
Shamelessly I try to "earn my living out of convincing everyone that global warming is their fault".
Some readers may be a little perplexed as to how such a business model could work out.
Well it's simple: (1) Blame your client and make them feel bad; (2) Suggest they stop doing things they like, e.g. flying away on holidays so much; (3) Plunge them into darkness, and make them feel bad again; (4) Submit large invoice; (5) Hope they pay.
There. See how easy it is! The truth is out.
No. It's a bit more subtle than that. Just Google carbon coach' to find out more. Also, legally speaking, any readers thinking of taking up this career path should be warned in financial terms, that "the living I make" is around HALF what it was before, just over three years ago now, when I was enjoying the directorship of a top London consultancy, and winning national awards for my leadership in sustainability.
I left that job on a mission to protect my children's inheritance - their home planet.
I take this subject deadly seriously, and I have done my homework.
Any accusation that I am in it for the money, is frankly laughable. I am in this game for the sake of the kids. It is that simple. Our children will not thank us for a good education, or a fat legacy, if they inherit a broken planet. Ask yourself, what could be the (latent) motivation of those who say it's okay to carry on burning fossil fuel?
The other belly laugh is the ridiculous notion that I have failed to submit my own personal proof' to the BFP letters page. Mr Weeden tells us that he was in science education until he was 25.
I have oft referred my readers to bodies as The Royal Society www.royalsociety.org whose freely downloadable and up-to-date publication "Is Global Warming a Swindle?", on their website homepage, no less, is an easy but authoritative read. Readers who have any real curiosity about this subject will find this document surprising.
Its conclusion is alarmingly unequivocal. When 99% of eminent independent world scientists agree something, then, (unlike your correspondents Messrs Weeden and Taylor,) I do not consider that I have that much to add.
The Professional Institutes that they proudly list after their names do not share their scepticism.
Sir David Attenborough made up his mind in 2006. And in 2007, even the US administration of President George W Bush concluded that mankind's contribution to global warming was no longer up for debate!
But in small pockets in Bucks, the denial, astonishingly, and shamefully, continues.
The Canute analogy is a good one. But it will take more than a few die-hard obfuscators: doggedly denying despots in Bucks, to stop the rising tide of the free-thinking world from joining the dots, and seeing the truth, behind the oil industry smoke screen.
It's undeniably tough, very tough indeed, for all of us to face the music, and bravely face the rough climate that lies ahead.
But if we don't, we are simply letting the children down. Saying "CO2 is not to blame" is simply a whopping great oil-soaked fantasy.
May I repeat my hope that those who urge complacency will be around long enough to be held responsible, by today's children, who will have to live with the consequences.
Dave Hampton, The Carbon Coach, Hyde Green, Marlow
Dave Hampton, Marlow says...
1:18pm Sun 10 Aug 08
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Find a job in High Wycombe and all around Buckinghamshire.
Search Now »
Make a date in High Wycombe and Buckinghamshire now!
Search Now »
Search for properties all over High Wycombe and across the UK.
Search Now »
Find used vehicles for sale in High Wycombe and all over Buckinghamshire
Search Now »
wayne, wycombe says...
6:35pm Fri 8 Aug 08
The rest of your website,from a resource reduction perspective, is certainly interesting and is much easier o relate to and emphasise with. I think you could have the same, (if not better results) were you to concentrate on this element.Either way, best of luck to you.