Report this comment
  • "Such anger! If it wasn't for the lack of terrible puns every other sentence, I would think you were the Carbon Coach in disguise.
    .
    Tell you what, in an attempt to calm things down, I'm going to attempt to discuss Mr Alexander's letter and exactly why I find it so amusing.
    .
    Firstly, I never claimed that the global warming debate had quietened down, I noted that it had dropped off on every recent poll of public concerns. I wouldn't mind, but, my letter was about 6 lines long and he still missed the point.
    .
    Secondly, I have no interest in lobby groups on either side of any debate. The position of Heartland or Greenpeace etc have no relevance. To bring them up is bizarre in the first place. To consider them a gauge of the state of the debate is just confused.
    .
    Even then, did Mr Alexander, apparent king of internet searches, fail to read about the leaked UEA emails and the ensuing mess? Hide the decline, Mann's dirty laundry? The entire Briffa divergence problem? I've never seen him write a letter even acknowledging these events, let alone imploring readers to google for it. It's all rather amusingly one-sided. But I digress.
    .
    Finally, slightly back towards the point my letter raised, we are treated to the patrons list of "Population Matters". Unfortunately, considering the Royal Society's motto 'Nullius in verba', I was disappointed that Mr Alexander failed to appreciate the irony of an appeal to authority as a "closer" to his argument.
    .
    The fact that James Lovelock, who recently dissented from his previously alarmist position over global warming, is present on the list is just a cheeky bonus.
    .
    That is why I found it "fantastically weird", but then, considering he has previously stated that his daffodils proved anthropogenic global warming, I shouldn't be surprised."
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

Please be fair, courteous and respectful to the views of others so we can build a vibrant community in a safe online environment. You are personal liable for your comments and action will be taken against anyone who offends, ridicules or posts malicious and damaging views. If you wish to complain, please contact us.

Reply was ill-informed

IT was predictable that Celia Carter’s letter on population growth and global warming (May 18) would provoke an ill-informed response like Bill Williams’s (June 1 – “ Is this really science”). How much he could learn from the Internet! You just need to know what to search for.

He observes that the debate over manmade global warming has quietened down. So it has: it may even be over. At the moment the “yeas” are riding high after the “nays” shot themselves in the foot. “Clean British Energy” and “Heartland Institute billboards” provide some useful clues.

As for Mr Williams’s suggestion that environmentalists have “shifted to Malthusianism”, you get a more realistic view from “Population Matters” .

Just look at that impressive list of patrons!

Eric Alexander, Dovecot Road, High Wycombe

Local Businesses

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree