The following cases have been heard at High Wycombe Magistrates' Court...
SUDAIS KHAN, 20, of Kingston Road, High Wycombe pleaded guilty to drug driving a Volkswagen Golf on Kelvin Close, High Wycombe. Khan was caught with THC - a component of cannabis - in his blood. He was banned from driving for 12 months and fined £153. He must also pay £85 court costs and a £61 surcharge.
JACK MCNALLY, 33, of Kingsmead Road, High Wycombe admitted driving without insurance, driving without a licence and drug driving in a Peugeot Partner van on Marlow Road, High Wycombe. He was caught with benzoylecgonine - a breakdown product of cocaine - in his blood. McNally was banned for 12 months and must pay a £600 fine. He was also ordered to pay £85 court costs and a £240 surcharge.
LOCHLAN WARKCUP, 18, of Chapel Street, Downley admitted drink driving after he was caught in a Ford Fiesta on Broadfields, Aylesbury with 66 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath. Warkcup was banned for 17 months and fined £222. He must pay £85 court costs and an £89 surcharge.
Read our previous court round-up here
EVELYN ALEXANDER, 60, of Highfield Park, Marlow pleaded guilty to two counts of speeding after she was caught at 79mph and 84mph on the M4 between junctions six and seven near Slough. The national 70mph limit was in place at the time of both incidents. Alexander was banned for six months and received a £150 and three points for each offence. She must pay £85 court costs and a £120 surcharge.
RICKI STOTT, 62, of Church Road, Marlow admitted exceeding a 50mph speed limit after he was caught on the A3095 Mill Lane in Bracknell travelling at 58mph. He was fined £307 and received three points. Stott must also pay £85 court costs and a £123 surcharge.
MARK ODELL, 60, of Orchard End Avenue, Amersham pleaded guilty to speeding after he was caught at 38mph on Stanley Hill, Amersham. The limit in that area is 38mph. Odell was given three points and must pay £100 court costs.
It is established in the UK that court cases should be heard in public.
This principle of open justice is acclaimed on a number of grounds: as a safeguard against judicial error and as a deterrent to perjury, to assist the deterrent function of trials and to permit the revelation of matters of public interest. Costs include victim surcharge and court charges.
Share