The following cases have been heard at High Wycombe Magistrates' Court...
MOHAMMED NAWAZ, 27, of Batchelors Way, Chesham pleaded guilty to driving without insurance, failing to comply with a preliminary test and failing to provide a specimen for analysis after he was caught in an Audi S3 on Elizabeth Avenue, Little Chalfont. Nawaz was given a one-year community order with 40 hours of unpaid work and an 18-month driving ban. He must pay £500 court costs and a £114 surcharge.
MICA JACKSON, 37, of Amersham Hill, High Wycombe admitted theft after stealing an Acer 11.6 screen laptop, mouse, chargers, plugs and 17 items of medication worth £600 in High Wycombe. He also pleaded guilty to arrest by a constable for breaking or being likely to break bail conditions, two counts of theft from a motor vehicle after he stole a locking wheel nut and a mobile phone, two counts of theft from a shop and one count of failing to surrender to bail. Jackson was given a six-month sentence suspended for 12 months with 20 rehabilitation days. He has been ordered to pay £419.99 compensation.
Read our previous court round-up here
AIDAN PICKERING, 23, of Nightingale Road, Chesham pleaded guilty to assault by beating in Chesham. Pickering was given a one-year community order with an alcohol abstinence and monitoring requirement, 15 rehabilitation days and 100 hours of unpaid work. Pickering was ordered to pay £85 court costs and a £114 surcharge.
SARAH WALLACE, 63, of High Street, West Wycombe admitted drink driving a Ford Fiesta on High Street, High Wycombe after she was caught with 93 micrograms of alcohol in 100ml of breath. Wallace was banned for 23 months and fined £480. She must pay £85 court costs and a £192 surcharge.
JOHN KAKPA, 47, of Deeds Grove, High Wycombe pleaded guilty drug driving after he was caught in a grey Peugeot on London End, Beaconsfield with THC in his blood. He was banned for 12 months and has been fined £207. Kakpa must also pay £85 court costs and an £83 surcharge.
It is established in the UK that court cases should be heard in public.
This principle of open justice is acclaimed on a number of grounds: as a safeguard against judicial error and as a deterrent to perjury, to assist the deterrent function of trials and to permit the revelation of matters of public interest. Costs include victim surcharge and court charges.
Share