Amersham pub plans slammed as unacceptable

Bucks Free Press: The site of the former Red Lion post demolition The site of the former Red Lion post demolition

PLANS to 'cram' nine dwellings onto land previously used as a pub were branded as "the unacceptable face of development" as they were rejected by councillors.

The proposals to replace the Red Lion in Amersham were slated by members of Chiltern District Council's planning committee, and their opposition to the planned development was met by applause from residents in a packed public gallery.

Residents and councillors said they were outraged and disgusted the pub, in Chestnut Lane, had been pulled down just a day after it was sold to developers Clearview Homes - apparently without the council's knowledge.

Howard Newton of Amersham Town Council said a "valuable amenity was destroyed at a stroke" and Clearview's ignorance of a requirement to serve 28 days' notice to demolish was slammed as "a cynical method of getting round the law".

Nobody from Clearview was present at Thursday night's meeting, as residents and committee members took it in turns to criticise the pub's demolition and the plans that had been put forward.

Cllr Nigel Shepherd led the way by saying: "I'm old enough to remember the financial downturn of the 70s when Edward Heath called Lonrho the unacceptable face of capitalism. We have in front of us what could be the unacceptable face of development.

"Clearview have cynically sidestepped the planning system by the simple method of pulling down an employment site and claiming it as an empty space.

"The top part of Amersham is seriously lacking in community facilities and community spaces. Clearview have come into town with their size ten boots and knocked down one of three pubs in top Amersham.

"Housing is required but a cursory glance at the core strategy [the council's planning policy] shows sites have been identified that meet that need. The land required from small sites like the Red Lion is precisely zero.

"As much as possible has been cramped into as little space as possible. Here we are yet again considering a development with miniscule rooms and postage stamp gardens."

He suggested a better plan would be for "four houses, not dwellings", explaining his reasoning as: "It will enable Clearview to leave enough space to partially compensate for the community facility and trees they so callously destroyed."

Cllr Nik Stewert said the council's planning department had no prior knowledge of any plans to demolish the Red Lion, adding legal action against the developer is a possibility.

He said: "It clearly shows Clearview are either incompetent or negligent. Either way, I wouldn't want anything to do with them if I were buying a property.

"Cllr Shepherd used the word appalling - they are words most of this committee would agree with using at this outrageous lack of regard, not only for the planning department, not only a sensible way forward for development, but also for the reasons the people of Amersham have put forward."

A total of 32 letters of objection were received by the council and Chestnut Lane resident Heather Baker reflected their views at the meeting by telling committee members: "We were disgusted and outraged at the way Clearview have acted.

"It [giving planning permission] would give a green light for developers to demolish first and ask questions later."

However the plans - for two pairs of semi-detached houses, a terrace of three houses and a building comprising two flats - were unamimously rejected by the committee.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

8:02am Tue 11 Dec 12

SL6 Supper Club says...

It could be worse, it could be another Tesco/Sainsbury's Local.
It could be worse, it could be another Tesco/Sainsbury's Local. SL6 Supper Club
  • Score: 0

9:26am Tue 11 Dec 12

pennman says...

There's no way a developer would be ignorant of that law. I know many developers, believe me! It's more likely that there is just a slapped wrist at stake for demolishing the building.
There's no way a developer would be ignorant of that law. I know many developers, believe me! It's more likely that there is just a slapped wrist at stake for demolishing the building. pennman
  • Score: 0

11:58am Tue 11 Dec 12

Amersham-Normal!! says...

Good. Forget the houses, putting something back for the community is what is required.

(also a bit rich for the council to harp on about the number of pubs as they have allowed so many to close and be redeveloped in old and top Amersham!)
Good. Forget the houses, putting something back for the community is what is required. (also a bit rich for the council to harp on about the number of pubs as they have allowed so many to close and be redeveloped in old and top Amersham!) Amersham-Normal!!
  • Score: 0

11:22pm Tue 11 Dec 12

Lividov says...

I'm surprised it's so few. Look how many they crammed into Cliveden Grange on a corner of Great Marlow School playing fields.
I'm surprised it's so few. Look how many they crammed into Cliveden Grange on a corner of Great Marlow School playing fields. Lividov
  • Score: 0

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree