News RSS Feed Send your news, pictures & videos


MP's hospital 'dream' after fairer funding petition to Parliament

MP's hospital 'dream' after fairer funding petition to Parliament MP's hospital 'dream' after fairer funding petition to Parliament

A HOSPITAL in Wycombe directly owned by residents would be the “dream”, MP Steve Baker says, after presenting a petition on 'fairer funding' to Parliament.

As the Government put forward its radical NHS reforms yesterday, Mr Baker handed over a document with 1,547 signatures.

It called for a better financial settlement for the county and more 'local control and freedom for clinical professionals'.

Currently the county receives 17 per cent less funding than the national average.

Mr Baker, Conservative, said he was “hopeful” changes outlined in the Coalition's Health and Social Care Bill will lead to 'fairer' funding and pledged to campaign for it.

But he warned: “If we get fairer funding I don't think we should necessarily expect the return of trauma or consultant led maternity.

“Now it's gone I think it would be incredibly difficult to achieve.”

Under Health Secretary Andrew Lansley's proposals GPs will be given much greater decision making powers, with primary care trusts being axed.

Mr Baker said this was key.

“I'm optimistic with GPs in the driving seat we will start to see a much happier settlement for health services in Wycombe and that's what I want to deliver,” he said.

Mr Baker, whose constituency includes Marlow Bottom, said the hospital is his top priority.

“It is our hospital, but the reality is the hospital is owned by the NHS, it's managed in the trust, it will go to a foundation in combination with Stoke Mandeville,” he said.

He said he wanted residents to be able to “genuinely say 'that hospital is ours'”.

“I would dream of having some kind of direct ownership of our health services in High Wycombe,” he said.

He said his role was to navigate this way, but ultimately it would be “determined by GPS and local people”.

Mr Lansley said Wycombe residents will get their wish for 'greater local control over NHS services' under his proposals.

He highlighted the creation of a nationwide 'pathfinder GP consortia'.

Wycombe practitioners will be among the first group for the scheme.

Mr Lansley said: “They will take this responsibility from tiers of regional and national NHS management.”

Councils will also play “a much greater role”, he added.

But the reforms have faced strong criticism.

Shadow health secretary John Healey, Labour, claimed the changes would “open up all areas of the NHS to price-cutting competition from private health companies and remove “proper openness, scrutiny and accountability to the public and to Parliament.”

He said: “They are driving free-market political ideology into the heart of the NHS and this is why doctors are now saying that, as it stands, the bill now spells the end of the NHS.”

A recent poll of 1,800 medics showed over half of GPs are concerned the bill will not lead to improved services.

Comments(9)

miccles says...
3:31pm Tue 1 Feb 11

See this bloke can speak when he wants to.

Ewartwhatyoubulldoze says...
3:55pm Tue 1 Feb 11

It's quite a skill to speak lots (when he wants to), yet say precisely nothing

Diogonese says...
3:59pm Tue 1 Feb 11

Stadium = local issue
NHS = national issue

Simples!

DeepThinker says...
4:25pm Tue 1 Feb 11

Is it me, or does he look like Gordon Brittas in the photograph?

Hazlemerelady says...
5:58pm Tue 1 Feb 11

He does speak ,just not about losing
240 arces of green belt land for a stadium which is
costing 88 million
, plus the use of public money to do so.
So much could be done with this money .

gpn01 says...
12:37am Wed 2 Feb 11

At one of the proposed stadium meetings a WDC officer was asked why money was being spent to support a private rugby & football club and could the money not instead be used to help local community needs such as improved facilities at Wycombe Hospital.
.
The officer responded that Wycombe Hospital funding came from the NHS and WDC could not be expected to fund a seperate public body.
.
If Wycombe Hospital ends up being 'owned' by residents, does this mean that WDC could instead now use enabling development to support the hospital instead of funding the ambitions of the private companies?

tom.marlow says...
8:30am Wed 2 Feb 11

I thought we owned it already.
.
If NHS properties are not already owned by the citizens of the UK, then who does own them?
.
Frankly I can't see that localizing some notional ownership is going to change anything. At the risk of being accused of cynicism all I can see happening is that when the the hospital under-performs as a result of the inevitable under-funding, the people of Wycombe will be told "Its your hospital, its down to you to do something about it"

Hazlemerelady says...
10:02am Wed 2 Feb 11

The hospital is not only thing being cut, elderly benefits, jobs the list goes on.
Given the choice for a stadium or hospital for our public money .I belive most people will choose hospital.
Or if you are friends with Steve Hayes of course the stadium.

Hilch says...
10:30pm Sat 5 Feb 11

Didn't the people of High Wycombe own the hospital in the first place, wasn't there a line of pennies placed along the High street and around the town to build it in the first place.

click2find

Most popular






About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree