Amersham waste transfer station plan thrown out (From Bucks Free Press)
Send your news, photos and videos by texting bucksfreepress to 80360 or email
Amersham waste transfer station plan thrown out
11:29am Tuesday 31st July 2012 in News By Andy Carswell
County Hall
CONTROVERSIAL plans to build a new waste transfer station in Amersham have been scrapped by Buckinghamshire County Council this morning.
The unanimous decision to reject the proposal was made at a meeting of the council’s Development Control Committee, after nearly 250 objections from residents and campaigners.
One member of the public, a Mr Jones, said at today's meeting developer FCC Environment had "misinformed residents" and had sought to "bully through" the application.
The plan would have seen the waste transfer station built along the A413, near the Cokes Lane junction between Amersham and Chalfont St Giles.
Committee members felt the proposal had not demonstrated it overcame the special circumstances needed for building within the Green Belt and Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.
The proposed site.
The projected traffic increase onto an already busy road was cited as another key reason for refusal.
Amersham town councillor Davida Allen said the proposals would form a "vast utalitarian building" and would be an "encroachment onto previous undeveloped land".
She said: "There are over 80 properties in close proximity. The impact will be so severe the properties will be blighted."
An 'extensive search' of the High Wycombe, Beaconsfield and Amersham area concluded an expansion of an existing depot was the only available option.
But Cllr Allen said the site shouldn't have been considered, and took a swipe at county council street lighting policy after stating 67 new lights would need to be provided to illuminate the
facility.
She said: "Sixty seven lights are proposed for constant use in the AONB - an area where residents are obliged to grope about in darkness since Bucks County Council switched off the lights."
Members of the planning committee agreed with the objections, unanimously backing their officers' recommendation to refuse the proposals.
Cllr Trevor Egleton said: "I don't think there's a minimal impact [on residents]. I think traffic will increase and will provide traffic problems getting in and out of that site, on a very fast
stretch of road.
"It will be visible through gaps in the trees - when winter comes it will be much, much more visible
"I was really surprised at the amount of green area we would be covering with concrete. I'm concerned about the scale and the impact, particularly when you view it on the ground."
Cllr Dev Dhillon added turning right out of the depot was "a bit of a challenge" and said the site was "not big enough".
Dan Murphy of FCC Enviroment, the company behind the development, said the facility would save Chiltern District Council £300,000 a year.
He added the Highways and Environment Agencies had raised no objections to the plans and the number of complaints from residents represented one per cent of the entire population of the Chiltern
district - which he said "doesn't constitute widespread concern".
But his words were not enough to persuade councillors to change their minds, as they turned down the plans after nearly an hour of discussions.
Had the scheme been approved rubbish would have been 'bulked' at the site before lorries took it to an incinerator in the north of the county, where it would have been burned to create
electrcity.
Plans for a similar facility at High Heavens in Booker were agreed earlier this year.
Comments are closed on this article.
Comments (12)
12:42pm Tue 31 Jul 12
miccles says...
The projected traffic increase onto an already busy road was cited as another key reason for refusal.
BUT ITS OK FOR BOOKER??
"She said: "There are over 80 properties in close proximity. The impact will be so severe the properties will be blighted."
BUT ITS OK FOR THE RESIDENTS OF BOOKER??
12:49pm Tue 31 Jul 12
wayneo says...
3:33pm Tue 31 Jul 12
ArnyP_HW says...
3:43pm Tue 31 Jul 12
gpn01 says...
h it might be!.
5:32pm Tue 31 Jul 12
ArnyP_HW says...
t...I mean er yes (maybe!) ;-)
5:33pm Tue 31 Jul 12
ArnyP_HW says...
9:02pm Tue 31 Jul 12
gpn01 says...
ov.uk/moderngov/Publ
ished/C00000105/M000
04743/AI00019961/$0C
C119003CMHighHeavens
ReportFINAL20120124.
docA.ps.pdf gives a full background to the High Heavens proposal - including the numerous objections against developing on Green Belt. Whilst BCC deferred the decision, it received the thumbs up from Communities and Local Government Secretary Eric Pickles (http://www.bucksfre
epress.co.uk/news/95
41950.Government_sig
ns_off_High_Heavens_
rubbish_tip_expansio
n/).
.
So, rather oddly, Central Government has approved the development on Green Belt at High Heavens and yet Bucks CC has rejected the plan at Amersham because it would be on Green Belt!
8:12am Wed 1 Aug 12
jdough says...
~
Don't blame the good burghers of Amersham for standing up for themselves.
9:40am Wed 1 Aug 12
motco says...
10:04am Wed 1 Aug 12
gpn01 says...
10:31am Wed 1 Aug 12
wayneo says...
10:48am Wed 1 Aug 12
gpn01 says...
ov.uk/moderngov/Publ
ished/C00000105/M000
04743/AI00019961/$0C
C119003CMHighHeavens
ReportFINAL20120124.
docA.ps.pdf
.
Seem to recall that both the Amersham and High Heavens sites are within both the AONB and Green Belt.