Bucks schools defend using CCTV in toilets

Bucks schools defend using CCTV in toilets Bucks schools defend using CCTV in toilets

SCHOOLS have defended their use of CCTV after a study by a civil liberties group revealed they have cameras in toilets and changing rooms.

Big Brother Watch used the Freedom of Information Act to gather data about the use of CCTV in 2,107 schools across the country.

The group claims 207 of those schools have cameras in toilets and changing areas, including the Highcrest Academy and Princes Risborough School.

Big Brother Watch said its findings call the privacy of schoolchildren into serious doubt and called for Government action.

But the south Bucks schools have explicitly stated the cameras are not pointed towards urinals or cubicles, and their ‘secure’ systems were only used to ensure the safety of pupils and staff members.

In a statement, Highcrest said: "The academy operates a CCTV system which is secure and access is strictly restricted with permission required from senior staff. Two staff must be present when recordings are viewed.

"CCTV cameras are not situated in any toilet area but do cover hand wash areas. CCTV reduces any instances of misbehaviour or bullying, and comments from students or parents about the system are almost always positive."

Princes Risborough School said it sought advice from the police and OSTED before it installed the CCTV system.

A statement to the BFP reads: "The purpose of the cameras is for the security and protection of the school and the safety of the children, staff and visitors.

"There are cameras which monitor all access points to the school and these have successfully been used in prosecuting intruders. There are also cameras at key points within the school to monitor corridors and stairwells.

"A small number of cameras are sited in our main toilets and these are static and are explicitly not focused on either urinals or cubicles. Police advice was sought and given over how and where these cameras should be mounted.

"The school constantly reviews its security in light of changing circumstances and technology. There are no plans to extend the cameras though the technology may be updated.

"No camera images are projected onto any screens and the cameras are not monitored. The only time they would be accessed is if there was an incident that needed to be investigated. Such occurrences are extremely rare.

"We know, and Ofsted have confirmed, that our students feel very safe at school. We have very little vandalism, very little graffiti, are smoke free and bullying is very rare.

"Princes Risborough School has an extremely high reputation for its pastoral care and parents and students alike at completely at ease with the present situation."

Big Brother Watch said it was highlighting a sensitive issue concerning not just who is viewing the footage but also that young people are growing up into an environment where surveillance is the norm.

It is calling for the Home Office’s code of practice for CCTV to be extended to all public bodies and a government-commissioned independent review of the use of CCTV in schools.

Director Nick Pickles said: "This research raises serious questions about the privacy of schoolchildren across Britain, with some schools having one camera for every five pupils and hundreds of schools using cameras in toilets and changing rooms.

"The full extent of school surveillance is far higher than we had expected and will come as a shock to many parents.

"Schools need to come clean about why they are using these cameras and what is happening to the footage.

"Local authorities also need to be doing far more to reign in excessive surveillance in their areas and ensuring resources are not being diverted from more effective alternatives.

"The Home Office’s proposed regulation of CCTV will not apply to schools and the new commissioner will have absolutely no powers to do anything. Parents will be right to say that such a woefully weak system is not good enough."

The figures also revealed Cressex Community School has seven cameras for every 15 pupils - but none in locker rooms or toilets.

Headteacher David Hood said this was because its new building was large, modern and is designed to cater for more pupils than are currently at the school.

He added: "As the number of pupils at the school gradually rises, the ratio of cameras to pupils will diminish.

"We use the cameras simply because they make people feel safe, they are not monitored and we only use them if we need to review or investigate an allegation."

Comments(3)

Slacker says...
10:26am Tue 25 Sep 12

When I saw the headline and brief summary I was a bit outraged but have now read the full story.

It seems the schools have enough safeguards to ensure that recordings are private and only used if there is an incident. Having two members of staff view the recordings is a good safeguard providing the safeguards are adhered to and there is no workaround for a lone teacher to spy on students.

Its possible that most bullying goes on in toilet blocks or changing rooms so this should give students a bit of security knowing if there is an incident they will be believed.

bonkers2010 says...
12:08pm Tue 25 Sep 12

all my kids have gone to highcrest , i have a son there at the moment .. an incident occurred where he was assaulted in the corridor the three boys that were there all had the same story that my son started it .. but they clearly didnt realize they were being filmed with sound aswell and my son was then believed that they were the ones in the wrong .. If parents have a problem with it then perhaps they should teach their children manners . and teach their children to be kind . no offence to highcrest but stuff still goes on including smoking in the toilets . and bullying . they do their best but cant stop all of it .. the kids smoke on the fields aswell some of them get caught , some dont .. I have in recent years heard about a couple of incidents of drugs being sold in several schools in high wycombe and children accessing **** of the school computers .. i sure if every parent were to have a good relationship with their kids they would be told all these things aswell and be able to make phone calls to the school to sort it out . as i did when my son went to highcrest the first year after it changed from hatters lane .. sorry kids but wet holes dot com is not apropriate for a school computer . highcrest were brilliant about it an sorted the glitch out very very quickly .. they have always been quick to sort out stuff . but again they have to go through the procedure and discover why kids bully children just incase they are being bullied at home by their parents .. schools have a hard time keeping up with the government changes of education . if a random bloke went into the toilets and assaulted a child . would the parent not want cctv image of them to catch them . we all moan about cctv . but we are all too quick to moan when a crime has been committed and there is no cctv .print some real news please bucks free press

osmith says...
12:09am Thu 27 Sep 12

I totally agree with Slacker. I finished A-levels last year - my grammar school didn't have any cameras in the toilet areas and I think it is long since overdue that they were installed there; the number of times you could walk into them and smell stale smoke or read racism or profanities on the walls from vandals was unacceptable.

I'm not really sure what 'bonkers2010's point is as it reads like a gossip in a hair salon.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree