Screen blocking drivers' view reduces speeds at crash blackspot in Little Marlow

A SCREEN blocking drivers' view as they approach an accident blackspot has actually helped reduce speeds, transport bosses say.

The green walls, costing £14,000, were installed earlier this year along Little Marlow Road as it reaches the A4155 roundabout.

There were 14 crashes which caused injuries between 2008 and 2011 at the site.

Nearby, an elderly woman was killed as she walked on the path past the roundabout last year.

The idea of reducing visibility on the east side of the roundabout at the junction with the A404 may initially sound like it might not be safe.

Yet studies at the Little Marlow location have shown the six feet tall screens have cut the average speed by 4mph.

Peter Chapman, collision investigator for Transport for Buckinghamshire, said: “This reduction in speed would give a motorist more time to react to others and may reduce the severity of any collision, should one occur.

“Generally a higher impact speed results in more severe injuries.”

A more significant statistic, he said, was that the daily number of drivers going over 50mph has been slashed by half.

He said: “In addition to increasing reaction time and reducing injury severity, also reduces the risk of drivers losing control when approaching and negotiating the roundabout.”

TfB, working on behalf of Buckinghamshire County Council, identified the spot as a priority after anaylysing accident figures.

The screens, which creator Mobilane says are also environmentally sound, cost £14,000.

Mr Chapman explained the average cost of preventing crashes casuing injuries is £68,000.

“Therefore £14k shows an excellent rate of return if it prevents just one of these collisions,” he said.

He added while it was too early to give a definitive conclusion about the screens he has been encouraged so far and they may in future be considered for use elswhere.

There were no reported collisions between January and June.

The green screens comprise a biodegradable pot which holds a wire mesh 'fence' onto which vegetation, usually ivy, is grown.

Sean Farrell, Director of Mobilane, said: “It is gratifying to see our green screen concept being more widely adopted as a solution to real life problems such as traffic safety, whilst adding all the environmental benefits that are missing from traditional methods such as walls and fences.”

Comments (12)

11:38am Tue 10 Jul 12

BucksComment says...

Good news that it has slowed people down. How on earth do you justify £14k for some posts and a bit of ivy?
Good news that it has slowed people down. How on earth do you justify £14k for some posts and a bit of ivy? BucksComment

12:54pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Ivor'sbestfriend says...

£14,000, really? Someone's having a laugh.
£14,000, really? Someone's having a laugh. Ivor'sbestfriend

1:08pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Cressex Offender says...

It's not even real Ivy, it's that plastic stuff!

I wondered why on earth that had been put there.
It's not even real Ivy, it's that plastic stuff! I wondered why on earth that had been put there. Cressex Offender

1:36pm Tue 10 Jul 12

Flackwell says...

I'd have done it for less

so if the councils listening and need any more done, just call
I'd have done it for less so if the councils listening and need any more done, just call Flackwell

2:09pm Tue 10 Jul 12

BOOKERite says...

£14,000 - why did they not go to a more competitive supplier - oh silly me for asking, its not their money, so why should they bother?
£14,000 - why did they not go to a more competitive supplier - oh silly me for asking, its not their money, so why should they bother? BOOKERite

3:01pm Tue 10 Jul 12

wayneo says...

Shouldn't judge whether it's a success after three years. To claim success after a few months when the previous accidents were over a span of 3 years appears somewhat premature to me.
Shouldn't judge whether it's a success after three years. To claim success after a few months when the previous accidents were over a span of 3 years appears somewhat premature to me. wayneo

3:45pm Tue 10 Jul 12

motco says...

wayneo wrote:
Shouldn't judge whether it's a success after three years. To claim success after a few months when the previous accidents were over a span of 3 years appears somewhat premature to me.
Agreed. The effect of reducing traffic speeds is undesirable if it does nothing towards road safety. It will only serve to increase fuel use, worsen congestion, and raise pollution levels if vehicles have to slow down more or even stop when they might have flowed and blended previously.
[quote][p][bold]wayneo[/bold] wrote: Shouldn't judge whether it's a success after three years. To claim success after a few months when the previous accidents were over a span of 3 years appears somewhat premature to me.[/p][/quote]Agreed. The effect of reducing traffic speeds is undesirable if it does nothing towards road safety. It will only serve to increase fuel use, worsen congestion, and raise pollution levels if vehicles have to slow down more or even stop when they might have flowed and blended previously. motco

5:35pm Tue 10 Jul 12

washondo says...

If slowing traffic improves road safety, why have BCC replaced roundabouts with traffic lights??
If slowing traffic improves road safety, why have BCC replaced roundabouts with traffic lights?? washondo

2:23pm Wed 11 Jul 12

Kania 2000 says...

Plastic Ivy at how much per metre? Must be an approved contractor!!!!!
Plastic Ivy at how much per metre? Must be an approved contractor!!!!! Kania 2000

3:18pm Wed 11 Jul 12

Bono97 says...

Sorry for this but I can confirm that the ivy is real and if you were to read the article you would see the cost of any injury collision. This includes the attendance of all the services and any time spent in hospital. The cost for the screens looks cheap against the cost of a single collision, take this over time and the cost will be even lower if further injury collisions are prevented.
Sorry for this but I can confirm that the ivy is real and if you were to read the article you would see the cost of any injury collision. This includes the attendance of all the services and any time spent in hospital. The cost for the screens looks cheap against the cost of a single collision, take this over time and the cost will be even lower if further injury collisions are prevented. Bono97

10:12pm Fri 13 Jul 12

laura loo says...

As I recall the accident in which the woman was killed was not at that roundabout by the one after it. The majority of the accidents occur in the opposite direction and this is more likely to be that the grass on the verges grows to 3 feet tall obstructing a drivers view. Ride on lawn mowers cost a lot less than £14000 maybe the council might think of investing in one.
As I recall the accident in which the woman was killed was not at that roundabout by the one after it. The majority of the accidents occur in the opposite direction and this is more likely to be that the grass on the verges grows to 3 feet tall obstructing a drivers view. Ride on lawn mowers cost a lot less than £14000 maybe the council might think of investing in one. laura loo

12:49pm Mon 16 Jul 12

Crackpot says...

Bono97 wrote:
Sorry for this but I can confirm that the ivy is real and if you were to read the article you would see the cost of any injury collision. This includes the attendance of all the services and any time spent in hospital. The cost for the screens looks cheap against the cost of a single collision, take this over time and the cost will be even lower if further injury collisions are prevented.
So effectively you would be happy to pay £14k to have fencing down one side of your garden then?? I see your point about the cost in comparison to the cost of an injury collision, but come on...if someone quotes for doing fencing, do they also take into account all the hidden uses and costs for other issues unrelated to the actual fence?! I think not. WDC should get in the real world and TRY saving money for the rest of us Tax payers...not just "using it or losing it". Ridiculous.
[quote][p][bold]Bono97[/bold] wrote: Sorry for this but I can confirm that the ivy is real and if you were to read the article you would see the cost of any injury collision. This includes the attendance of all the services and any time spent in hospital. The cost for the screens looks cheap against the cost of a single collision, take this over time and the cost will be even lower if further injury collisions are prevented.[/p][/quote]So effectively you would be happy to pay £14k to have fencing down one side of your garden then?? I see your point about the cost in comparison to the cost of an injury collision, but come on...if someone quotes for doing fencing, do they also take into account all the hidden uses and costs for other issues unrelated to the actual fence?! I think not. WDC should get in the real world and TRY saving money for the rest of us Tax payers...not just "using it or losing it". Ridiculous. Crackpot

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree